WebThe second major difference from those other tools is the use of the Ruby programming language upon which Chef and Puppet are built. In day to day usage, however, you will notice subtle differences between Chef … WebNov 13, 2024 · Important differences. There are a number of important differences between these tools that are worth drawing out. Chef and Ansible use a procedural style language where you write code that …
Chef vs Puppet UpGuard
WebNov 30, 2024 · Every configuration management tool, including Ansible, Chef, Puppet and SaltStack, caters to specific organizational goals and preferences. Ansible and Puppet, … WebOne of the biggest differences is how resources are described: Puppet uses a declarative language that is similar to JSON or XML. You describe the resource’s state but cannot intervene in how this state is achieved. … int. conf. learn. represent
Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible - Whizlabs Blog
WebAnswer (1 of 6): Ansible is definitely the easiest one to learn, it is basically simple yaml, use python (which is popular among System Admins) and rely on well known Unix Systems Administration Tools (ssh/sudo…) Puppet is the second one, thanks to its customized Domain Scripting Language (DSL) ... WebAnswer (1 of 6): A lot has changed since this question was originally posed. Trying to answer the question behind the question I would venture that there is truth to the notions that Chef is optimized for developers and Puppet for sysadmins. Both rely on training IT staff to learn and use new scr... WebApr 14, 2024 · Chef: Like Puppet, it is also a management tool written in Ruby. It is based on an agent. Therefore, it requires specific software to run on managed devices. The Chef agent is not supported by all Cisco devices. A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) is used by files that are based on the Ruby language. The Chef uses the following text files: jobs that will hire